In the constant search of evidence of extraterrestrial beings visiting our planet there is an astonishing number of "clues" that aliens might accidentally or deliberately leave. Among the reported cases of alien contacts perhaps less known are the so-called "alien implants, these implants consist of small microchips, pagers or any kind whatsoever that would function to inform the aliens on a individual previously abducted.
is unknown exactly what the function for which these small objects are introduced into the body of the abductees. Although there are several hypotheses that seem to gain more strength are those that tell of tracking systems or storage of information on the activities of the abductee, the aliens thus may have information about our performance, behavior and daily habits. The equivalent would be the marking of animals that humans do to see the same data in colonies of endangered animals or simply to better understand their behavior.
There are other theories a little more "negative" talk neuronal control system, a method that visitors could use to achieve their goals of political control, social or ideological about our society, so the abductee would behave like a normal person, but at certain times of the implant would act as a neurotransmitter and send about the subject to obey orders that aliens getting influenced in a direct way in our society.
How are you located?
The most amazing thing is that these implants cause any tissue rejection in the carrier, typically to be made an object in the body it reacts naturally with a rejection, leading to inflammation, infection, cystic fibrosis or coatings. But in any case alien implants found these effects, it also found unexplained scarring where previously there were no yesterday.
Generally the only way to locate these implants is through small marks or scars that appear mysteriously after being abducted subjects. Yet they have found some after performing scanner and without showing any skin mark.
creator of the Foundation for Interactive Research and Space Technology (FIRST) and the hypnotist Derrel Sims, senior researcher in the UFO and founder of FIRST, conducted several surgical operations in collaboration with a team physicians. The first series of extractions, "implants" took place on August 19, 1995 in Roger Leir clinic in Thousand Oaks.
As was proved by X-rays, Pat Parrinellio, a man of 47, and Mary Jones, 52, both of Houston (Texas), had housed strange objects in their bodies, though none remembered having been previously operated. Both cases were investigated by Derrel Sims, who, based on encounters with UFOs that these people had in the past, referred to Roger Leir to operate them. Pat is extracted objects back and left hand thumb and Mary his left foot.
implants taken from the first series of surgical procedures were reviewed by two pathologists and then sent to independent laboratories for analysis. The tests evaluated the pathology of the tissue was laser spectroscopy and conducted several metallurgical tests including density measurements immersion, x-rays, electron microscopy, X-rays and study of electromagnetic properties and fluorescence tests. All these tests were conducted at the National Institute of Discovery Science (NIDS) in New Mexico and other independent laboratories.
While these anomalous objects were being analyzed, another set of implants, surgical extractions took place on May 18, 1996. The two women who led this second round of operations volunteered to be interviewed and subject to study. Debbie O., 61 years living in Lancaster (California) and Susie Adams, 40, will Similar objects were removed from the bottom of the left leg. A Licia Davidson, 37, who has had numerous encounters with UFOs and EBE, the foot was extracted in January 1997, a strange-looking object lens.
"The discoveries made as a result of these surgeries are very strange. In all cases there was little swelling, "said Roger Leir. This reaction is not normal when tissues outside the body. Normally, foreign bodies embedded in tissues usually cause some type of chronic inflammation, as well as fibrosis and cyst formation. Something that did not happen in these cases.
pathological reports after the first two interventions revealed that metal objects were covered with a dense gray membrane and rugged, composed of keratin protein himosiderina and clot. More specifically, it was protein and blood cells normally found in the surface layer of the skin. The resistant cocoons that covered biological implants also contain nerve cells in a tissue that is not in this part of the body. These formations gave off a bright green fluorescence in the presence of ultraviolet light.
implants present in the two women in the second set of interventions had no metallic properties as the first.
In fact, this was whitish and spherical objects that did not contain resistant covers previous biological or glowed under ultraviolet light. According to pathology reports, biological implants, possibly, did not trigger inflammation. The crystal-looking object removed from the foot in the most recent intervention was not covered by any gray and leathery outer membrane and the swelling was only observed in the other extractions. The test results undertaken on the first series of implants revealed that metal objects were needle-shaped meteoric origin and contained at least eleven different elements.
In an interview published in the journal Alien Encounter Magazine (UK), Derrel Sims did mention the fact that the body of these people had not experienced rejection of the implants: "It was felt that this dense fibrous membrane be part of the skin surface itself, as if the metal objects had been wrapped in a sheath of keratin. The nerve fibers once covered the tissue and appeared to be attached to the nerves. "
can see their small size.
Its composition and function is unknown.
0 comments:
Post a Comment